<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SmileySteve&#039;s Blog &#187; insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ratedsar.com/wp/tag/insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ratedsar.com/wp</link>
	<description>Musings on Tech, Politics, Sports, and my Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Email : Competition</title>
		<link>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2010/01/health-care-email-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2010/01/health-care-email-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratedsar.com/wp/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may have gone a little overboard on this as it&#8217;s 3am in the morning and a 1 paragraph email turned into several pages. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Open competition for insurance is part of what the problem in the insurance industry is today! In the mid and late 80s insurance companies were paying out &#62;95% of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have gone a little overboard on this as it&#8217;s 3am in the morning and a 1 paragraph email turned into several pages.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Open competition for insurance is part of what the problem in the  insurance industry is today! In the mid and late 80s insurance companies  were paying out &gt;95% of their income from premiums to claims and by  the late 90s, thanks to deregulation, this percentage is down to  &lt;85%.</p>
<p>When competition is a factor, <strong>companies know not to compete on price</strong>,  business students are taught this in standard curriculum. By having  open competition, companies are now spending that <strong>additional 10% of  premium income on MARKETING and ADVERTISING</strong> &#8211; something that  government granted monopolies don&#8217;t have to do as much.</p>
<p>At one point, <strong>insurers were owned by the policyholders</strong> &#8211;  effectively making insurance a not for profit industry. Not for profit  does not mean that staff/administration don&#8217;t make money, but it does  mean that shareholder&#8217;s are no longer interested in a bottom line.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Open competition :</span> pretty silly &#8211; see comparison of energy  deregulation in GA, why is your electricity and cable regulated?<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Tort reform:</span> needs to happen, I believe both sides want some. <strong>This  can not happen with competition</strong>, as the current competition has  every insurance company suing every other insurance agency or  stakeholder to avoid paying out of that insurance that you purchased. (I  have a great real world example of this if you want me to tell you the  story.)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pre-existing conditions : </span> I recently met a man who was <strong>denied  his insurance claim due to pre-existing conditions</strong> when he <strong>broke  his neck biking during a triathlon</strong>. I can&#8217;t even begin to think how  that works.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Media Influence Note:</span> John Grisham&#8217;s the Rainmaker came out in 1996.  In it, Great Benefit Health Insurance denied a claim (and all claims  made by policyholders.) While the client won a settlement that was never  paid, there have been <strong>no major health insurance regulations made  since</strong>.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Republican Note:</span> If the GOP really hated &#8220;socialized&#8221; health care  on principle, then they should <strong>suggest getting rid of medicare and  medicaid</strong>. Beyond that, they could go with the local government  measure of having state/county insurance (which they do for state  employees anyway) to <strong>stress federal conservatism </strong>and states  rights.</p>
<p>&gt;<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">The bill does not involve a massive,  centralized budget busting takeover of our healthcare system<br />
This is a Joe Wilson style, &#8220;You Lie.&#8221; While, the health care bill was  written to be <em>budget busting </em>it is written to be in a reducing  the budget and costs to Americans. Have you read the news? <strong>Americans  are #1 in % GDP Spent on Healthcare.</strong> (and 17th below numerous  &#8220;socialized&#8221; systems in actual care) This means that the U.S. must be  either <strong>extremely unhealthy</strong> or that there are<strong> huge  inefficiencies</strong> in the system that don&#8217;t seem to be prevalent in the  other &#8220;socialized&#8221; systems.<br />
</span></p>
<div>On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Corey &lt;palioc33@yahoo.com&gt; wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div><a href="mailto:palioc33@yahoo.com" target="_blank"></a></p>
<div>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: x-small;">&#8212;&#8211;  Forwarded Message &#8212;-<strong> </strong><br />
<strong>Sent:</strong> Thu, January 28, 2010  11:06:38 AM<br />
<strong>Subject:</strong> Setting the record straight<br />
</span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Let&#8217;s set the record straight right now  about our  President&#8217;s statement last night that the Republicans have been  virtually  sitting on their hands and saying &#8220;no&#8221; to everything and that is the  reason  healthcare reform has gone nowhere.  That is completely false. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">In the house the Republicans have  worked very hard  and crafted a bill called HR-3400.  The bill does not involve a massive,   centralized budget busting takeover of our healthcare system . . .  instead it  offers very intelligent improvements to our existing system.  The two  most  notable improvements are tort reform and open competition among  insurance  companies across state lines.  In the Senate the Republicans have  crafted a  similar bill called the Patients&#8217; Choice Act.  Like the House bill, it  features tort reform and open competition among insurance companies  across state  lines.  Those two improvements alone would reduce costs immeasurably and   save billions in wasted healthcare dollars.  The Democrats want no part  of  these Republican ideas and have spurned every attempt to include them in  the  process.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">What you may or may not think of a  President who  would go on national television and distort the truth like that is  another issue  for another day . . but for today please forward this to as many people  as you  can to at least set the record straight.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2010/01/health-care-email-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving on Every Day Things &#8211; Car Edition</title>
		<link>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2009/03/saving-on-every-day-things-car-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2009/03/saving-on-every-day-things-car-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratedsar.com/wp/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buying a new car is not ideal in any economy. It's this mindset that you can always sell more that is hurting car companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as I noted yesterday in my post on Gold, I breezed through Dave Ramsey&#8217;s book. I&#8217;m also pretty familiar with his other financial advice due to members of my family also being very financially acclimated. Dave and Clark Howard both have a group of every day expenditures that they like to call the stupid tax.</p>
<p><strong>Cars</strong></p>
<p>I drive a fancy 20 year old Mazda RX-7, it&#8217;s stylish and I paid for it in full in high school, and I come to the somewhat painful realization on road trips that maybe <strong>1 in 10 </strong>cars is close to the age or older than mine. I think that the truth that reflects on societies is that my car is noticeably one of the oldest daily driven cars at most colleges and high schools, where it is typically safe to assume that the driver did not pay for the car outright and probably does not pay for the insurance.</p>
<div id="attachment_55" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 244px"><a href="http://ratedsar.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/img_1630.jpg" rel="lightbox[54]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-55" title="1989 RX-7" src="http://ratedsar.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/img_1630-300x225.jpg" alt="1989 Mazda RX-7" width="234" height="175" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">1989 Mazda RX-7</p></div>
<p>In his book, Ramsey has done the research that suggests that the average person with a car loan pays <strong>$376 a month</strong>, every month of their lives. I don&#8217;t know about you, but that is absolutely shocking what people will do for luxury.</p>
<p>In addition to this loan cost, consider your costs of insurance, especially if it&#8217;s an almost dead car worth hardly its value in steel, you will save a ton in not having (your fault) collision insurance. For teens, that can double the insurance premium.</p>
<p>Furthermore, when you finance your brand new car, it loses <strong>60% of its value</strong> in the first <strong>4 years</strong> as a depreciating asset that is likely to suffer damage and wear.</p>
<p>Dave Ramsey goes on to suggest that you should look at cars that are<strong> 2-4 years old</strong> and that the majority of millionaires own these older cars as their &#8220;new&#8221; cars. That warranty tends to not be worth it either. As an example, I was looking at cars this December and ran into a premium edition Infiniti G-35 with 50k miles for only $15k (the new ones were right around $30k.) Bringing me to a small and optional <strong>point Learn to Drive a stick</strong>&#8230; you might enjoy it and you will save about $2k on many cars.</p>
<p><strong>The 14-20 year loans</strong> that some financing arms offer is the most ridiculous part though! I can&#8217;t think of anybody who buys a new car and plans on driving it for 10 years&#8230; and you would still owe most of the loan amount at the point anyway. So when you sell your car 5 years later without GAP insurance you would still be paying for your own car. (By the way, at the Atlanta Boat Show this year there were $200/month terms for $35k boats over 20 years &#8212; which is equally as appalling &#8211; especially at the 7% interest they wanted to charge)</p>
<p><strong>Market Wise</strong> we all know that GM, Chrysler, and Ford (U.S. companies) are having dreadful sales and I think that a lot of it has to do with the car industry overselling their products. The SUV has changed America, but people don&#8217;t need or want to buy a new Suburban, Escalade every two years. And then thing about work trucks, like the F150, most companies keep these trucks for just over four years. But what this means is that there is a limit. <strong>GM Sold More cars than they had every sold before in 2007</strong> barely beating Toyota. But there are<strong> limits to the  driving need</strong>, and unless GM can get that <strong>marginal cost down</strong> and stop <strong>depending on selling infinite  cars</strong> in the future then it will never survive in the long run.</p>
<p>I added this to the <strong>Environmental </strong>category as well because, well, getting more use out of the same 4000lb piece of metal is environmental. My car may not get 35mpg, but it gets slightly above 20 (very comparable to the RX-8), but by not buying another car, I&#8217;m reducing the parts and minerals being used in a new one. I&#8217;m also saving junk yard space.  Reemember &#8211; Reduce comes before recycle, so I&#8217;m reducing and encouraging you to do the same.</p>
<p>Finally, <strong>I&#8217;m going to make your kids hate me</strong>. Don&#8217;t buy them a brand new car. Don&#8217;t give them a car that is worth much or amazingly appealing. I used my dad&#8217;s 1991 pickup form 2002-2005 that was won at auction from a company for a reduced price. It got me around just fine. It was pretty safe, reasonable looking, and I had my first off-roading experiences among with other in it. So, get that junker like they suggest in Transformers and let your kids figure out what kind of car is for them.  And remind them not to complain about something that they&#8217;re getting for free (or on discount.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ratedsar.com/wp/2009/03/saving-on-every-day-things-car-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<img style='margin:0;padding:0;border:0;' width='1px' height='1px' src="http://ratedsar.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/mystat/mystat.php?act=time_load&id=39112&rnd=338979494" /></channel>
</rss>
